Blazor vs react performance

Blazor vs react performance


By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. Ive been learning Vuejs for a while now, recently ive started to learn Asp.

Blazorhas allot of similarities to VUE.

blazor vs react performance

Do i basicly use Blazor like a JS framework, yet, it uses C? Learn more. Which is better to USE??? Javascript Framework vs ASP. Asked today.

Active today. Viewed 45 times. Justcode Justcode 1 1 1 bronze badge. New contributor. I don't know what you mean by "workflow" and even otherwise, your question is too broad.

blazor vs react performance

Active Oldest Votes. The Overflow Blog. Socializing with co-workers while social distancing. Podcast Programming tutorials can be a real drag. Featured on Meta. Community and Moderator guidelines for escalating issues via new response…. Feedback on Q2 Community Roadmap. Dark Mode Beta - help us root out low-contrast and un-converted bits. Technical site integration observational experiment live on Stack Overflow.

Update 10th July 2018

Triage needs to be fixed urgently, and users need to be notified upon…. Related Hot Network Questions. Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled.By Daniel Roth and Luke Latham.

Blazor Server is supported in ASP.

What’s the Difference Between Razor and Blazor?!?

NET Core 3. NET and web development workload. NET Core Blazor hosting models. Provide a project name in the Project name field or accept the default project name. Confirm the Location entry is correct or provide a location for the project. Select Create. For a Blazor Server experience Visual Studio Install the.

Optionally install the Blazor WebAssembly preview template by running the following command:.

blazor vs react performance

Confirm the installed. Install Visual Studio Code.

Comparing Native Blazor Components to Wrapped JavaScript Components

The IDE requests that you add assets to build and debug the project. Select Yes. With Blazor WebAssembly, start the app using the. For more information, see Debug ASP. Blazor Server is supported in Visual Studio for Mac. Blazor WebAssembly isn't supported at this time. Install Visual Studio for Mac.

Set the Target Framework to. In the Project Name field, name the app WebApplication1.If you have worked with ASP. Since ASP. But what is all this talk about Blazor recently? How are these two frameworks related? Is Blazor going to replace Razor? In this post, we will take a look at both of these frameworks, what they are and how they can help you build your next web application.

Lets get started by creating a new ASP. NET Core Web application. For detailed instructions, you can follow the step-by-step tutorial here. Once you select OKVisual Studio will generate a basic starter application. From here you can build, run, and debug your new project. As mentioned previously, ASP. Lets zero in on what Razor Views are and the purpose they serve. This is where Razor works its magic. As shown in this example, when a controller returns a view it can optionally provide a view model.

A view model is an instance of a class that contains data that can be used to render the view. On Line 1, we can see a view model ErrorViewModel is bound. Lines 9 and 12 show how we can embed C inside of our view in order to provide logic and display data from our view model.

The result of this process is HTML. Once ASP. With our Error. Looking at line 7, we can see there is no sign of the Model. RequestId that is present in our cshtml file. This highlights a key behavior of ASP. With each request, the server provides the browser with html and data. This concept has a couple other effects. In addition to the extra data going over the wire, the browser is required to fully render this new set of data. Many of the limitations of server-side web frameworks like ASP.

Ugr�s a tartalomra

After the initial set of static content html, js, css, etcthe only thing that is passed to and from the server is data, typically in the form of JSON. This leads to a much more fluid experience for the end users. While Single Page Applications provide us with a rich user experience, this does not come without a cost. A significant portion of the application gets moved to a new language with a different set of tools, frameworks, etc.

This is where Blazor comes into play. As before, we begin by creating a new ASP. The key difference this time is we select the Blazor project template.Blazor is a.

NET web framework that runs in any browser. On the other hand, React is detailed as " A JavaScript library for building user interfaces ". Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. Blazor and React are both open source tools. React with K GitHub stars and For those who want to develop business in China, Vue. I never thought Vue.

In China, there are far more engineers familiar with Vue. The reason why Vue.

Schon cx cues

From technical side, Vue. The most convenience part is Vue. To be frankly, I love Vue. For a really big and huge project, I will consider Angular, after all, there are far more complicated and interesting plugins to play with, Angular need more time, more code, more complex, but we senior engineer is living for some sophisticated code which only we can understand and set barriers for other beginners, right?

For developing our frontend applications, we decided to use Vue. Being such an easy to learn library, compared to React for example, it made everything so easy. At first we started with Polymer but the existing tooling and small community at the time made us look for alternatives. I use React because I think it is the one that embraces the most the functional component design.

Dino Esposito. Blazor—the C# Angular or the return of Silverlight? .NET Fest 2018

Having to work with Vue or Angular is a lot of pain for me, especially because I'm used to the simplicity of React which comes with the great price of a high learning curve. Also, the use of the Flux Pattern is so much easier with React, being designed as a one way data flow, than with its two foremost competitors.

blazor vs react performance

I recommend using Angular 2 when moving from Angular 1 if you are looking for a fully featured framework solution. Neither Vue. However if you are looking for something lightweight to add reusable components to an existing application Vue.

I use React because it provides a high level of flexibility to architecture the front end app having the posibility or not to incorporate other libraries such as State Management, Routing or Form Validation, among others. Unidirectional flow and component reutilization is another important advantage. Back inmy company had a back-office dashboard that was originally built in AngularJS 1. Since Angular 2 presented drastic changes we decided to rethink the options and we looked at React and Vue.

Now years later we are very happy with our choice. I find using Vue. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.We compare native Blazor components to wrapped JavaScript components by understanding how Blazor works, including what native vs. NET application code in the browser. This future-forward framework allows developers to leverage their existing. NET code and skills to create web applications that can run completely client-side without the need for browser plug-ins.

As with any new web framework, we're presented with a challenging decision of bringing along assets from previous works into the new system. In the case of Blazor, the challenge presents itself in the User Interface UI components of the application model. Due to previous lack of choice, web UIs are written in JavaScript, whereas Blazor heavily utilizes the C language and Razor markup syntax. This stark contrast of choices forces one's hand in one of two directions - rewrite native UI components or reuse your JavaScript UI components.

Let's explore the challenge by understanding how Blazor works, what native vs. Blazor is a new breed of web application framework, a first of its kind. Blazor is similar in many respects to React or Angular, but what sets it apart is the underlying architecture is crafted upon WebAssembly instead of JavaScript.

A Blazor application is a true. NET application, running on a. NET runtime inside the browser. This is quite an important factor in the decision process when it comes to writing UI components for Blazor, as you should know the context in which the component is executed. No matter what framework you choose, DOM manipulation is a taxing process which is often compounded by directly changing its structure more frequently than necessary. Without a proper execution plan, most approaches to DOM manipulation destroy and rebuild chunks of DOM, ripping out multiple nodes and repainting them.

This is a solved problem in modern frameworks through the use of a DOM abstraction. Think of the RenderTree as copy where changes can be quickly made as nodes in this tree can be created, updated and deleted without consequence of re-rendering the page. Now multiple components in the system can make changes against the RenderTree at once with much less of a performance hit. When the dust has settled, the RenderTree and DOM are reconciled by looking for the differences between the two and re-rendering only what's absolutely necessary.

The RenderTree is vital to UI components behavior and render speed.If you want to write a dynamic web application in then the chances are that you will reach out for a JavaScript solution, and that solution will probably be React.

What if you have a. Like a React component, a Blazor component can be passed parameters from its parent component and have internal state. Blazor components are written as classes, and they have lifecycle methods reminiscent of React component classes. NET to combine C and markup. Visual Studio also currently has a frustrating amount of trouble formatting Razor files in a consistent way.

In Blazor, routing is feature of the framework. I appreciated the simple design of this feature and prefer it to having to pick a third-party library in React. As Blazor uses the. This is extremely useful when you have code which needs to run both client and server-side. Despite Blazor having lots of features, there will still be situations where you need JavaScript. This allows you to call any global JavaScript function i.

This means we can declare inside a component that it requires a particular service, and at runtime Blazor will provide an instance of that service to the component. Prerendering happens when the server executes a client side application, takes a snapshot of the DOM and uses this for the markup it sends to the client. This makes the application appear to load faster in the browser and allows search engines to scrape your landing page more easily.

React is about as easy to debug as any other JavaScript code though you will probably want a source map to account for JSX transpilation. Blazor is definitely less polished in this regard. Although React and Blazor have much in common, a large part of their value comes from which server stack you combine them with. Blazor feels near-complete and I would strongly consider using it in a situation where I had a critical. NET library or. NET server-side code which needed to run in the browser.

Horror blonde girl ride man

Otherwise I would stick with React on the basis of its maturity, tooling, JavaScript integration and hooks. Blazor will no doubt improve in these areas in the future and I will be keeping my eye on how the framework evolves. Non-necessary cookies are stored in your browser and collect information about how you use the site.

We use this information to help us improve the site and how it works. Non-necessary cookies do not store any personal information. Non-necessary cookies requires you to enable their use.NET team. I mean, how many superset or transpile to JavaScript languages have sprung up over the years to help improve JavaScript and make it more maintainable?

CoffeeScript, Dart, Elm and Scala—to name but a few. Looking at the most loved languages, TypeScript, a language designed by the legendary Anders Hejlsbergtops the list.

The same man who designed Cno less. It adds features such as interfaces, classes, compile time type-checking, even generics. However, all those features and more already exist in Cand have done for years. C is a powerful, flexible, feature rich language that is easy to learn.

But Blazor has already started to show it has potential as a highly efficient and productive programming model outside of its original design—as a direct competitor to JavaScript single page application SPA frameworks. Microsoft already has multiple experiments going on with Blazor, trialling it with desktop applications using Electron and WebWindow an experimental lightweight alternative to Electron.

But most recently, for native mobile app development where the Blazor programming model is mixed with native Xamarin forms controls. Could we be seeing the start of a single unified UI framework for building any type of application with. NET, be it web, desktop, or mobile?

By using different renderers Blazor is able to create not only web based UIs, but also native mobile UIs as well. However, the programming model is the same. Meaning once developers are familiar with it, they can create UIs using any renderer.

These renderers are more commonly referred to as hosting models. At the time of writing, there are four hosting models for Blazor in various stages of development. Blazor Server is the only production supported model at the time of writing. Blazor WebAssembly is due for release around May —I would expect this could be the big announcement at Build.

This is the engine room of the framework. Here we can find all the non-UI specific elements which make Blazor work. The part I want to focus on though is the programming model. Out of the four hosting models I talked about above, the first three have one thing in common, they all understand web standards.

Applications built for this hosting model will need to have their components written using native mobile controls. Both samples have a markup section and a code block. In fact, the code blocks are identical between the samples. Now we have a bit more of an understanding about how Blazor is put together, I want to talk a bit about the two main hosting models, Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly. The Blazor Server hosting model is currently the only production supported option for Blazor development right now.

It was released back in September with. NET Core 3, during.